With Incompass, you make every performance management decision defensible




.png)













People are your largest investment — often more than 70% of total expenses — yet most companies measure them with less rigor than customers or revenue. That’s why performance management can’t be another HR task: it’s the engine that connects talent to business outcomes. Done well, it shows leaders who to promote, who to develop, and where to invest. Done poorly, it undermines trust and growth.
Performance management should be the engine that powers growth, retention, and fairness — but most organizations are running it on outdated systems that create drag instead of momentum. Slow, manual processes cost HR and managers weeks of time. Reviews vary wildly depending on who’s giving them, eroding trust and engagement. Leaders are left making compensation and promotion decisions with partial data, while employees walk away uncertain about how to grow. The result is predictable: costly attrition, wasted budgets, and overlooked potential.



Sliding-scale peer reviews and dual-manager support deliver richer, fairer insights - in a fraction of the time.
Bias-adjusted scoring, percentile stretching, and a dynamic 9-Box grid give HR and leaders consistent, defensible talent decisions.
Interactive development plans and coaching prompts turn reviews into continuous development.
With Incompass, our CEO feels confident handing off more management responsibilities, and our leaders are stepping up.

Incompass gave me the tools to give better and more impactful feedback to my manager, peers, and team.
This is an incredibly innovative and bold way to identify and keep top talent.
I love how Incompass incorporates the sliding scale with AI! It makes the review process so much more fair, insightful... It’s clearly built for modern teams.

Too many companies rely on outdated performance management platforms. As a result, HR burns weeks on manual calibration, leaders make high-stakes calls without an accurate picture, and employees disengage from a process that doesn’t feel fair. The fallout? Misaligned promotions, drops in morale and wasted time and money.